http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0205-02.htm
c'est roboratif, âcre, guilleret, virulent, attentif, dur à cuire... ça commence comme ça :
"Kurt Vonnegut: A Requiem for the USA
Kurt Vonnegut is dwelling on the apocalypse. It’s not that his omelette isn’t good. It’s not that his mood is downcast, but for the third time over lunch in Manhattan, America’s funniest and most pessimistic novelist is explaining why he will welcome the end of the world. “I don’t like life very much for what it does to other people,” he says. This is by no means the most depressing statement he makes between starter and main course, but somehow, by the time we leave the restaurant I feel inspired and full of hope.
Taken at face value, Vonnegut’s worldview is appallingly bleak. He tells me that “all the other species are dying and so will we”. He a rgues that almost everybody is “humiliated, frustrated, terribly disappointed”, and compares life to an enforced spell in the army lasting 80 years instead of three. An hour in the company of such an acutely-aware Eeyore could be dispiriting, were it not for his belief in the redemptive power of creativity and his endless capacity for jokes. “I’m whistling as I walk past the graveyard,” he admits, “and I’m whistling as beautifully as I can.”
glose & scolie totalement digressives
pourquoi le verbe a rgues dans le texte de l'entretien, 2e l. du 2e parag, est en italique et le 'a' séparé du 'rgues' : à cause de loufoque perplexifiant mystère codant, et comme quoi j'aurais dû rajouter espiègle : si j'enlève l'espace entre le 'a' et le 'rgues' ça donne ça : argues !! dingue, non ? et sans les : devant, : derrière hein, non non..
c'est mal tenu c'est endroit c'est fou ! déjà qu'on peut plus parler de "discours", ni de "maître", ni de "pamoison"... et là, arghh... unsër Ö va-t-il supprimer mon compte, me liquider ? quid du p.c.a.m.d.v. ???
c'est ignoble, je sais. je reviens.
non sérieux, le truc du a rgues = argues, ça scotche, mieux qu'un livre, ça laisse stupide. ¨W;7[)
